Historical Cost
| Currently accountants in the U.S. record assets on the balance sheet using historical cost, or the amount that the company or individual paid for the asset at the time of purchase. |
Historical cost ignores the amount the asset could be sold for in the open market, called the fair value, until the asset is actually sold. The company carries the asset on the balance sheet at the purchase cost less any depreciation taken. At the time of sale, the company records a gain or a loss against the purchase cost of the asset less any depreciation if applicable.
Historical Cost Accounting Example
For example, if Sunny purchased an asset for $5,000 and estimated depreciation expense of $500 per year for 10 years, the cost of the asset after the first year less depreciation is $4,500. If the market value of the asset were $4,800 after year one in the open market, Sunny would not write up the asset after the first year. Rather, the asset would remain at original cost less any depreciation until the asset is sold.
If Sunny sold the asset for $4,800 after year one, Sunny recognizes a realized gain of $300.
Sale of Equipment at Historical Cost
| Account and Explanation | Debits | Credits |
| Cash | $4,800 | |
| Accumulated Depreciation | $500 | |
| Equipment | – | $5,000 |
| Gain on Sale of Equip. | – | $300 |
| To record sale of asset at original cost less depreciation. |
Therefore, assets on the balance sheet are recorded at historical costs until sold. Since everyone in the U.S. is currently required to follow the historical cost principle, users of financial statements understand where the asset values are coming from: the price originally paid for the asset (less any depreciation where applicable).
Historical Cost and Fair Value Accounting: Relevance and Reliability Revisited
The historical cost principle follows the accounting quality of reliability since everyone can agree on the original purchase price of an asset. However, the historical price is not necessarily relevant information. Land that was purchased 20 years ago could be worth much more than the balance sheet shows. Likewise a building purchased many years ago and recorded on the balance sheet at the original cost does not reflect the current market price.
For this reason, many accountants and users of financial statements argue that the market price, or fair value should be used when reporting financial information. The fair value is more relevant, but is not necessarily reliable. Selling the same item at different auctions will lead to a wide range of winning bids for the same item, and even professional appraisers will value an asset at a range of prices instead of a set value.
Differences can involve the future use of the asset, assumptions about its useful life and output, and opinions and professional judgments that result in a range of values for an asset. Like other professions, professional appraisers balance opinions and judgments with verifiable data. So although the market price, or fair value of an asset may be more relevant, it is less reliable.
The reliability vs. relevance debate centers on one of the key issues in financial reporting and one of the major transitions currently underway in GAAP: the transition from historical cost to fair value accounting.
Currently accountants in the U.S. are not allowed to write up the value of an asset to the market or fair value, but accountants are required to write down an asset when an asset is materially impaired in any way. This follows the GAAP accounting principles of conservatism and reliability, since assets could be written up and overstate a company’s financial position.
Other countries, however, commonly write up assets to the market value. In order to make financial statements more uniform internationally, FASB is currently working with The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) to follow consistent standards worldwide.
As part of this project, FASB is recommending a transition from historical cost to fair value for some assets, which would create sweeping and somewhat controversial changes to how some assets are reported on the balance sheet as the reliability vs. relevance debate continues.
Financial Reporting: Historical Cost to Fair Value Accounting
FASB has started a gradual convergence of financial reporting standards with the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) to transition from the longstanding historical cost basis to fair value accounting.
From Historical Cost|Fair Value Accounting Back to the Online Accounting Main Page
Back to the GAAP Accounting Main Page
Back to the Accounting Terms Main Page
Online Accounting|Business Accounting Home Page
Great question.
Yes, International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) allows an asset to be written up to fair value. It is unusual but allowed.
If there is reason for the asset to be written up, then depreciation is taken as you outlined.
Partial impairment goes straight to accumulated depreciation.
Partial impairment
Permanet impairment is the difference between the full cost of asset and the total accumulated depreciation
as of the time of impairment.
Total and permanent impairment
Hi Kenneth F. Meunier! I need an answer to the same question Chris asked. Thanks in anticipation for your response.
How would depreciation work when assets are carried at their fair market value?
Lets’s assume I would buy a machine for $1000 in year one with an expected life of 5 years. After the first year, the asset would be valued at $800 on my balance sheet and I can deduce $200 as book depreciation from my taxable income on my income statement. (I understand that there might be a difference in my book depreciation and applicable tax depreciation, which could lead to deferred tax, but let’s assume that is not the case right now).
OK, that was US GAAP, let’s assume we switch to IFRS.
Again, I buy the same asset for $1000 and estimate an expected life of 5 years.
Nevertheless, after 1 year, the asset’s fair market value is thought of being $2000 (for whatever reason). Does that mean I can now revalue the asset down to $1600 and show $400 as depreciation expense on my income statement? That does not really make sense to me. Similarly, let’s assume the asset is only worth $100 after the first year of ownership (again, for whatever reason). This would be case for an impairment from $1000 to $100, right? – So what about depreciation?? Thanks.
I am really confused about all that!
Sorry if my question should be stupid or has an obvious answere…. I am pretty new to the accounting world.
Sorry, just saw that Claudio asked the first question….. and is not the one that answered it….
Hi Claudio,
How would depreciation work when assets are carried at their fair market value?
Lets’s assume I would buy a machine for $1000 in year one with an expected life of 5 years. After the first year, the asset would be valued at $800 on my balance sheet and I can deduce $200 as book depreciation from my taxable income on my income statement. (I understand that there might be a difference in my book depreciation and applicable tax depreciation, which could lead to deferred tax, but let’s assume that is not the case right now).
OK, that was US GAAP, let’s assume we switch to IFRS.
Again, I buy the same asset for $1000 and estimate an expected life of 5 years.
Nevertheless, after 1 year, the asset’s fair market value is thought of being $2000 (for whatever reason). Does that mean I can now revalue the asset down to $1600 and show $400 as depreciation expense on my income statement? That does not really make sense to me. Similarly, let’s assume the asset is only worth $100 after the first year of ownership (again, for whatever reason). This would be case for an impairment from $1000 to $100, right? – So what about depreciation??
I am really confused about all that!
Sorry if my question should be stupid or has an obvious answere…. I am pretty new to the accounting world.
Any explanation would be highly appreciated.
With kind regards,
Chris
Hi Claudio –
There are different provisions for different assets/liabilities. See the following for each:
SFAS 159 for financial assets and liabilities: Once made, fair falue options are generally irrevocable.
IAS 40 – fair value reporting for investment property, changing from fair value to cost only permitted if change results in more appropriate presentation, which IAS 40 states is unlikely.
Property, plant and equipment under U.S. GAAP still under historical cost, and both GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) require property and equipment to be initially recorded at cost, but IFRS allows the option (IAS 16) to chooose between historical cost or revaluation to fair value. Revaluation must apply to the entire class of property (not asset by asset basis) and you must also disclose the asset at historical cost.
Can I switch from Fair Value to Cost?? I will strongly appreciate help with this.